Demographics details for Fairmont, NC vs San mateo, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairmont, NC vs San mateo, CA.
| Data | Fairmont | San mateo |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,188 | 100,984 |
| Median Age | 48.1 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $31,731 | $149,152 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Fairmont vs San mateo
- The population in San mateo is higher at 100,984, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- Residents in Fairmont have a higher median age of 48.1 years compared to 38.1 years in San mateo.
- San mateo has a higher median income of $149,152, compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- In San mateo, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 8% in San mateo.
- The unemployment rate in Fairmont is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.4% in San mateo.
Demographics
Demographics Fairmont vs San mateo provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairmont | San mateo |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 2 |
| White | 14 | 32 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 28 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 25 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 12 |
| American Indian | 23 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairmont vs San mateo
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairmont at 62% compared to 2% in San mateo.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in San mateo at 32% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- In San mateo, the Asian population stands at 28%, greater than 0% in Fairmont.
- San mateo has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 25%, compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San mateo at 12%, compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairmont at 23% compared to 1% in San mateo.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairmont | San mateo |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 13.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 15.5% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 8.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 47.2% | 22.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairmont vs San mateo
- More residents in Fairmont report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.1% in San mateo.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairmont at 22.6% compared to 15.5% in San mateo.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairmont at 26.0% compared to 8.7% in San mateo.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San mateo at 16.2% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairmont at 47.2% compared to 22.8% in San mateo.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 9.0% in San mateo.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairmont | San mateo |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (7) | 1.8% (1,834) |
| High School Diploma | 27.5% (602) | 8.2% (8,262) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (282) | 11.5% (11,608) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (316) | 44.1% (44,508) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairmont vs San mateo
- In San mateo, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a high school diploma at 27.5% compared to 8.2% in San mateo.
- More residents in Fairmont have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 11.5% in San mateo.
- In San mateo, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 44.1% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.