Demographics details for Fairmont, NC vs Luna pier, MI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairmont, NC vs Luna pier, MI.
| Data | Fairmont | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,188 | 1,367 |
| Median Age | 48.1 years | 52.1 years |
| Median Income | $31,731 | $48,073 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairmont vs Luna pier
- In Fairmont, the population is higher at 2,188, compared to 1,367 in Luna pier.
- The median age in Luna pier is higher at 52.1 years, compared to 48.1 years in Fairmont.
- Luna pier has a higher median income of $48,073, compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- In Luna pier, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 9% in Luna pier.
- The unemployment rate in Fairmont is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Luna pier.
Demographics
Demographics Fairmont vs Luna pier provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairmont | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 1 |
| White | 14 | 92 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | 23 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairmont vs Luna pier
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairmont at 62% compared to 1% in Luna pier.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Luna pier at 92% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- In Luna pier, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fairmont.
- Luna pier has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Luna pier at 5%, compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairmont at 23% compared to 0% in Luna pier.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairmont | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 25.5% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 47.2% | 42.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairmont vs Luna pier
- More residents in Fairmont report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.7% in Luna pier.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Luna pier at 25.5% versus 22.6% in Fairmont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairmont at 26.0% compared to 20.2% in Luna pier.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Luna pier at 18.4% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairmont at 47.2% compared to 42.5% in Luna pier.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 15.0% in Luna pier.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairmont | Luna pier |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (7) | 0.7% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 27.5% (602) | 20.4% (279) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (282) | 7.5% (102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (316) | 12.7% (174) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairmont vs Luna pier
- In Luna pier, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a high school diploma at 27.5% compared to 20.4% in Luna pier.
- More residents in Fairmont have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 7.5% in Luna pier.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 12.7% in Luna pier.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.