Demographics details for Fairmont, NC vs Kelso, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairmont, NC vs Kelso, TN.
| Data | Fairmont | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,188 | 185 |
| Median Age | 48.1 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $31,731 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 70.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairmont vs Kelso
- In Fairmont, the population is higher at 2,188, compared to 185 in Kelso.
- Residents in Fairmont have a higher median age of 48.1 years compared to 42.0 years in Kelso.
- Kelso has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- In Kelso, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 13% in Kelso.
- The unemployment rate in Fairmont is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Kelso.
Demographics
Demographics Fairmont vs Kelso provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairmont | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | Data is updating |
| White | 14 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | 23 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairmont vs Kelso
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairmont at 62% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kelso at 100% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- Both Fairmont and Kelso have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Fairmont and Kelso at 0%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairmont at 1% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairmont at 23% compared to 0% in Kelso.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairmont | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 22.6% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 47.2% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairmont vs Kelso
- More residents in Fairmont report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairmont at 22.6% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairmont at 26.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairmont at 12.7% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairmont at 47.2% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairmont | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (7) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 27.5% (602) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (282) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (316) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairmont vs Kelso
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a high school diploma at 27.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- More residents in Fairmont have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.