Demographics details for Fairmont, NC vs Hazel, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairmont, NC vs Hazel, KY.
| Data | Fairmont | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,188 | 398 |
| Median Age | 48.1 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $31,731 | $36,765 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fairmont vs Hazel
- In Fairmont, the population is higher at 2,188, compared to 398 in Hazel.
- Residents in Fairmont have a higher median age of 48.1 years compared to 38.8 years in Hazel.
- Hazel has a higher median income of $36,765, compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- In Hazel, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 14% in Hazel.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fairmont and Hazel at 5.0%.
Demographics
Demographics Fairmont vs Hazel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairmont | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 10 |
| White | 14 | 76 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
| American Indian | 23 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairmont vs Hazel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairmont at 62% compared to 10% in Hazel.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hazel at 76% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- In Hazel, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Fairmont.
- Hazel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 3%, compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hazel at 6%, compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairmont at 23% compared to 0% in Hazel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairmont | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 12.5% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 27.6% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 19.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 47.2% | 38.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 35.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairmont vs Hazel
- More residents in Fairmont report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.3% in Hazel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hazel at 27.6% versus 22.6% in Fairmont.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairmont at 26.0% compared to 19.0% in Hazel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Hazel at 15.0% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairmont at 47.2% compared to 38.9% in Hazel.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hazel at 35.0% compared to 27.0% in Fairmont.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairmont | Hazel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (7) | 0.8% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 27.5% (602) | 21.9% (87) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (282) | 21.1% (84) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (316) | 9.0% (36) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairmont vs Hazel
- In Hazel, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a high school diploma at 27.5% compared to 21.9% in Hazel.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hazel at 21.1%, compared to 12.9% in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.4% compared to 9.0% in Hazel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.