Demographics details for Fairmont, NC vs Folsom, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairmont, NC vs Folsom, CA.
| Data | Fairmont | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,188 | 83,269 |
| Median Age | 48.1 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $31,731 | $134,935 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.8 |
Population Comparison: Fairmont vs Folsom
- The population in Folsom is higher at 83,269, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- Residents in Fairmont have a higher median age of 48.1 years compared to 39.9 years in Folsom.
- Folsom has a higher median income of $134,935, compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- In Folsom, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 7% in Folsom.
- The unemployment rate in Fairmont is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.8% in Folsom.
Demographics
Demographics Fairmont vs Folsom provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairmont | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 4 |
| White | 14 | 54 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 18 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 14 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 10 |
| American Indian | 23 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairmont vs Folsom
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairmont at 62% compared to 4% in Folsom.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Folsom at 54% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- In Folsom, the Asian population stands at 18%, greater than 0% in Fairmont.
- Folsom has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 14%, compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Folsom at 10%, compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairmont at 23% compared to 0% in Folsom.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairmont | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 13.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 8.4% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 9.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 17.8% |
| Obesity | 47.2% | 28.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairmont vs Folsom
- More residents in Fairmont report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 13.9% in Folsom.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairmont at 22.6% compared to 17.7% in Folsom.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairmont at 26.0% compared to 9.5% in Folsom.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Folsom at 17.8% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairmont at 47.2% compared to 28.0% in Folsom.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 7.0% in Folsom.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairmont | Folsom |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (7) | 0.5% (451) |
| High School Diploma | 27.5% (602) | 7.7% (6,439) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (282) | 6.1% (5,119) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (316) | 36.4% (30,311) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairmont vs Folsom
- In Folsom, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.3% in Fairmont.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a high school diploma at 27.5% compared to 7.7% in Folsom.
- More residents in Fairmont have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 6.1% in Folsom.
- In Folsom, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 36.4% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.