Demographics details for Fairmont, NC vs Falls church, VA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairmont, NC vs Falls church, VA.
| Data | Fairmont | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,188 | 14,586 |
| Median Age | 48.1 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $31,731 | $164,536 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 22% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairmont vs Falls church
- The population in Falls church is higher at 14,586, compared to 2,188 in Fairmont.
- Residents in Fairmont have a higher median age of 48.1 years compared to 38.8 years in Falls church.
- Falls church has a higher median income of $164,536, compared to $31,731 in Fairmont.
- In Falls church, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 25.0% in Fairmont.
- Fairmont has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 6% in Falls church.
- The unemployment rate in Fairmont is higher at 5.0%, compared to 2.5% in Falls church.
Demographics
Demographics Fairmont vs Falls church provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairmont | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 62 | 5 |
| White | 14 | 65 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 11 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 10 |
| American Indian | 23 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairmont vs Falls church
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairmont at 62% compared to 5% in Falls church.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Falls church at 65% compared to 14% in Fairmont.
- In Falls church, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Fairmont.
- Falls church has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 0% in Fairmont.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Falls church at 10%, compared to 1% in Fairmont.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairmont at 23% compared to 0% in Falls church.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairmont | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 11.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 16.4% | 6.5% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 26.0% | 7.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 12.7% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 47.2% | 30.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 27.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairmont vs Falls church
- More residents in Fairmont report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 11.9% in Falls church.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairmont at 22.6% compared to 19.9% in Falls church.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairmont at 26.0% compared to 7.5% in Falls church.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Falls church at 18.8% compared to 12.7% in Fairmont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairmont at 47.2% compared to 30.8% in Falls church.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairmont at 27.0% compared to 7.0% in Falls church.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairmont | Falls church |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (7) | 0.3% (50) |
| High School Diploma | 27.5% (602) | 4.1% (597) |
| Less than High School | 12.9% (282) | 2.7% (388) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.4% (316) | 52.5% (7,660) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairmont vs Falls church
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Fairmont and Falls church at 0.3%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairmont hold a high school diploma at 27.5% compared to 4.1% in Falls church.
- More residents in Fairmont have less than a high school education at 12.9% compared to 2.7% in Falls church.
- In Falls church, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 52.5% compared to 14.4% in Fairmont.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.