Demographics details for Fairhope, AL vs Wichita falls, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairhope, AL vs Wichita falls, TX.

Data Fairhope Wichita falls
Population 23,859 102,664
Median Age 44.9 years 32.8 years
Median Income $85,456 $55,584
Married Families 48.0% 34.0%
Poverty Level 8% 14%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 4.9

Population Comparison: Fairhope vs Wichita falls

  • The population in Wichita falls is higher at 102,664, compared to 23,859 in Fairhope.
  • Residents in Fairhope have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 32.8 years in Wichita falls.
  • Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456 compared to $55,584 in Wichita falls.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairhope at 48.0% compared to 34.0% in Wichita falls.
  • The poverty level is higher in Wichita falls at 14%, compared to 8% in Fairhope.
  • Wichita falls has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.4% in Fairhope.

Demographics

Demographics Fairhope vs Wichita falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairhope Wichita falls
Black 4 12
White 89 54
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 4 22
Two or More Races 2 8
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Fairhope vs Wichita falls

  • In Wichita falls, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 12% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
  • Fairhope has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 54% in Wichita falls.
  • In Wichita falls, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Fairhope.
  • Wichita falls has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 22%, compared to 4% in Fairhope.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Wichita falls at 8%, compared to 2% in Fairhope.
  • In Wichita falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairhope.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairhope Wichita falls
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 18.3%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 12.5%
Depression 22.6% 24.6%
Smoking 12.0% 18.6%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 18.7%
Obesity 34.7% 37.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairhope vs Wichita falls

  • In Wichita falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Fairhope.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Wichita falls at 24.6% versus 22.6% in Fairhope.
  • Wichita falls has a higher smoking rate at 18.6% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Wichita falls at 18.7% compared to 18.4% in Fairhope.
  • Wichita falls has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 34.7% in Fairhope.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Wichita falls at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairhope Wichita falls
No Schooling 0.3% (75) 1.0% (1,035)
High School Diploma 7.1% (1,686) 15.1% (15,510)
Less than High School 4.6% (1,098) 14.6% (14,970)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.8% (8,552) 15.1% (15,550)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairhope vs Wichita falls

  • In Wichita falls, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
  • In Wichita falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.1% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Wichita falls at 14.6%, compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairhope hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 15.1% in Wichita falls.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.