Demographics details for Fairhope, AL vs Pinellas park, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairhope, AL vs Pinellas park, FL.

Data Fairhope Pinellas park
Population 23,859 53,653
Median Age 44.9 years 43.9 years
Median Income $85,456 $62,306
Married Families 48.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.4 3.3

Population Comparison: Fairhope vs Pinellas park

  • The population in Pinellas park is higher at 53,653, compared to 23,859 in Fairhope.
  • Residents in Fairhope have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 43.9 years in Pinellas park.
  • Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456 compared to $62,306 in Pinellas park.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairhope at 48.0% compared to 38.0% in Pinellas park.
  • The poverty level is higher in Pinellas park at 10%, compared to 8% in Fairhope.
  • The unemployment rate in Fairhope is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.3% in Pinellas park.

Demographics

Demographics Fairhope vs Pinellas park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairhope Pinellas park
Black 4 6
White 89 62
Asian 1 11
Hispanic 4 13
Two or More Races 2 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairhope vs Pinellas park

  • In Pinellas park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
  • Fairhope has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 62% in Pinellas park.
  • In Pinellas park, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Fairhope.
  • Pinellas park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 4% in Fairhope.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Pinellas park at 8%, compared to 2% in Fairhope.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairhope and Pinellas park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairhope Pinellas park
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 9.4% 11.5%
Depression 22.6% 19.6%
Smoking 12.0% 22.3%
Binge Drinking 18.4% 17.1%
Obesity 34.7% 27.8%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 17.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairhope vs Pinellas park

  • In Pinellas park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.8% in Fairhope.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fairhope at 22.6% compared to 19.6% in Pinellas park.
  • Pinellas park has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 17.1% in Pinellas park.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fairhope at 34.7% compared to 27.8% in Pinellas park.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Pinellas park at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairhope Pinellas park
No Schooling 0.3% (75) 2.6% (1,420)
High School Diploma 7.1% (1,686) 17.5% (9,393)
Less than High School 4.6% (1,098) 19.3% (10,338)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 35.8% (8,552) 17.9% (9,620)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairhope vs Pinellas park

  • In Pinellas park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.6% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
  • In Pinellas park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.5% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Pinellas park at 19.3%, compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairhope hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 17.9% in Pinellas park.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.