Demographics details for Fairhope, AL vs Lincoln, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairhope, AL vs Lincoln, IL.
| Data | Fairhope | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,859 | 13,084 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 40.4 years |
| Median Income | $85,456 | $54,002 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairhope vs Lincoln
- In Fairhope, the population is higher at 23,859, compared to 13,084 in Lincoln.
- Residents in Fairhope have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 40.4 years in Lincoln.
- Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456 compared to $54,002 in Lincoln.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairhope at 48.0% compared to 37.0% in Lincoln.
- The poverty level is higher in Lincoln at 10%, compared to 8% in Fairhope.
- Lincoln has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.4% in Fairhope.
Demographics
Demographics Fairhope vs Lincoln provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairhope | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 5 |
| White | 89 | 87 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairhope vs Lincoln
- In Lincoln, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- Fairhope has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 87% in Lincoln.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairhope at 1% compared to 0% in Lincoln.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairhope at 4% compared to 3% in Lincoln.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lincoln at 5%, compared to 2% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairhope and Lincoln at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairhope | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 11.2% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 35.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 18.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairhope vs Lincoln
- In Lincoln, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.8% in Fairhope.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairhope at 22.6% compared to 22.0% in Lincoln.
- Lincoln has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 18.0% in Lincoln.
- Lincoln has higher obesity rates at 35.9% compared to 34.7% in Fairhope.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lincoln at 18.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairhope | Lincoln |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (75) | 0.1% (10) |
| High School Diploma | 7.1% (1,686) | 24.3% (3,182) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (1,098) | 9.4% (1,231) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (8,552) | 13.0% (1,701) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairhope vs Lincoln
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairhope have no formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.1% in Lincoln.
- In Lincoln, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.3% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lincoln at 9.4%, compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairhope hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 13.0% in Lincoln.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.