Demographics details for Fairhope, AL vs Bethany, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairhope, AL vs Bethany, OK.
| Data | Fairhope | Bethany |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 23,859 | 20,447 |
| Median Age | 44.9 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $85,456 | $54,606 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairhope vs Bethany
- In Fairhope, the population is higher at 23,859, compared to 20,447 in Bethany.
- Residents in Fairhope have a higher median age of 44.9 years compared to 32.7 years in Bethany.
- Fairhope has a higher median income of $85,456 compared to $54,606 in Bethany.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairhope at 48.0% compared to 34.0% in Bethany.
- The poverty level is higher in Bethany at 13%, compared to 8% in Fairhope.
- The unemployment rate in Fairhope is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Bethany.
Demographics
Demographics Fairhope vs Bethany provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairhope | Bethany |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 4 | 8 |
| White | 89 | 56 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 4 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairhope vs Bethany
- In Bethany, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- Fairhope has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 56% in Bethany.
- Both Fairhope and Bethany have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Bethany has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 4% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Bethany at 12%, compared to 2% in Fairhope.
- In Bethany, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Fairhope.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairhope | Bethany |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.4% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 22.6% | 26.6% |
| Smoking | 12.0% | 18.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 13.5% |
| Obesity | 34.7% | 37.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairhope vs Bethany
- In Bethany, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.6% compared to 15.8% in Fairhope.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Bethany at 26.6% versus 22.6% in Fairhope.
- Bethany has a higher smoking rate at 18.1% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairhope at 18.4% compared to 13.5% in Bethany.
- Bethany has higher obesity rates at 37.6% compared to 34.7% in Fairhope.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Bethany at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairhope.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairhope | Bethany |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.3% (75) | 1.2% (246) |
| High School Diploma | 7.1% (1,686) | 15.7% (3,220) |
| Less than High School | 4.6% (1,098) | 13.4% (2,736) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 35.8% (8,552) | 14.7% (3,014) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairhope vs Bethany
- In Bethany, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.3% in Fairhope.
- In Bethany, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 7.1% in Fairhope.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Bethany at 13.4%, compared to 4.6% in Fairhope.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairhope hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 35.8% compared to 14.7% in Bethany.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.