Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Tacoma, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Tacoma, WA.
| Data | Fairfield | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,464 | 221,776 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $44,277 | $79,085 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Tacoma
- The population in Tacoma is higher at 221,776, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 36.9 years in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher median income of $79,085, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Tacoma.
- Tacoma has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Tacoma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 11 |
| White | 73 | 53 |
| Asian | 9 | 9 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
| American Indian | 1 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 11% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 53% in Tacoma.
- Both Fairfield and Tacoma have the same percentage of Asian residents at 9%.
- Tacoma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Tacoma at 13%, compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- In Tacoma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 1% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 26.2% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 34.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Tacoma at 26.2% versus 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 17.1% compared to 15.4% in Tacoma.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 16.2% in Tacoma.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 36.6% compared to 34.6% in Tacoma.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Tacoma at 14.0% compared to 13.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Tacoma |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 1.6% (3,474) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 14.2% (31,504) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 10.1% (22,501) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 23.0% (50,913) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Tacoma
- In Tacoma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.6% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Tacoma, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.2% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Tacoma at 10.1%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 23.0% in Tacoma.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.