Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Sulphur, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Sulphur, LA.
| Data | Fairfield | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,464 | 20,342 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 38.9 years |
| Median Income | $44,277 | $53,606 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Sulphur
- The population in Sulphur is higher at 20,342, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 38.9 years in Sulphur.
- Sulphur has a higher median income of $53,606, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In Sulphur, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Sulphur at 15%, compared to 12% in Fairfield.
- Sulphur has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Sulphur provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 9 |
| White | 73 | 83 |
| Asian | 9 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 2 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sulphur at 83% compared to 73% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 1% in Sulphur.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Fairfield and Sulphur at 5%.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 4% compared to 2% in Sulphur.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Sulphur.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 28.7% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 21.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sulphur at 28.7% versus 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Sulphur has a higher smoking rate at 21.3% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sulphur at 20.6% compared to 19.8% in Fairfield.
- Sulphur has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 36.6% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sulphur at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Sulphur |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.5% (93) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 24.2% (4,925) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 19.3% (3,918) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 11.7% (2,384) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Sulphur
- In Sulphur, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Sulphur, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sulphur at 19.3%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 11.7% in Sulphur.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.