Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Stuttgart, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Stuttgart, AR.
| Data | Fairfield | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,464 | 7,907 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $44,277 | $59,124 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Stuttgart
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 9,464, compared to 7,907 in Stuttgart.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has a higher median income of $59,124, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Stuttgart at 18%, compared to 12% in Fairfield.
- Stuttgart has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Stuttgart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 42 |
| White | 73 | 53 |
| Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 0% in Stuttgart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 5% compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 4% compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Stuttgart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stuttgart at 24.4% versus 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Stuttgart has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 36.6% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.8% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 25.5% (2,015) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 14.5% (1,144) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 12.0% (948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Stuttgart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stuttgart at 14.5%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.