Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Potts camp, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Potts camp, MS.
| Data | Fairfield | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,464 | 409 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 45.6 years |
| Median Income | $44,277 | $21,845 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 20.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 25% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Potts camp
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 9,464, compared to 409 in Potts camp.
- The median age in Potts camp is higher at 45.6 years, compared to 43.0 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $44,277 compared to $21,845 in Potts camp.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 32.0% compared to 20.0% in Potts camp.
- The poverty level is higher in Potts camp at 25%, compared to 12% in Fairfield.
- Potts camp has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Potts camp provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 13 |
| White | 73 | 80 |
| Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Potts camp
- In Potts camp, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Potts camp at 80% compared to 73% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 5% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Potts camp at 7%, compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Potts camp.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.0% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 21.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 13.8% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 41.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Potts camp
- In Potts camp, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Potts camp at 23.0% versus 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Potts camp has a higher smoking rate at 21.7% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 13.8% in Potts camp.
- Potts camp has higher obesity rates at 41.8% compared to 36.6% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Potts camp at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Potts camp |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.5% (2) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 13.7% (56) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 12.0% (49) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 8.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Potts camp
- In Potts camp, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Potts camp, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Potts camp at 12.0%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 8.1% in Potts camp.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.