Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Nesmith, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Nesmith, SC.
| Data | Fairfield | Nesmith |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,464 | 2,626 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 42.4 years |
| Median Income | $44,277 | $39,304 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Nesmith
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 9,464, compared to 2,626 in Nesmith.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 42.4 years in Nesmith.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $44,277 compared to $39,304 in Nesmith.
- In Nesmith, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Nesmith at 13%, compared to 12% in Fairfield.
- Nesmith has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Nesmith provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Nesmith |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 42 |
| White | 73 | 46 |
| Asian | 9 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Nesmith
- In Nesmith, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 8% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 46% in Nesmith.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 2% in Nesmith.
- Nesmith has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- Both Fairfield and Nesmith have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Nesmith.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Nesmith |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 20.1% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 31.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Nesmith
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 17.1% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 36.6% compared to 0.0% in Nesmith.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Nesmith at 31.0% compared to 13.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Nesmith |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.5% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 21.7% (571) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 22.1% (580) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 8.6% (225) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Nesmith
- In Nesmith, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Nesmith, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Nesmith at 22.1%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 8.6% in Nesmith.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.