Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Manheim, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Manheim, PA.

Data Fairfield Manheim
Population 9,464 5,012
Median Age 43.0 years 33.6 years
Median Income $44,277 $75,833
Married Families 32.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 12% 8%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Manheim

  • In Fairfield, the population is higher at 9,464, compared to 5,012 in Manheim.
  • Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 33.6 years in Manheim.
  • Manheim has a higher median income of $75,833, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
  • In Manheim, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 8% in Manheim.
  • Manheim has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield vs Manheim provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield Manheim
Black 8 1
White 73 87
Asian 9 Data is updating
Hispanic 5 5
Two or More Races 4 7
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Manheim

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 8% compared to 1% in Manheim.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Manheim at 87% compared to 73% in Fairfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 0% in Manheim.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Fairfield and Manheim at 5%.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Manheim at 7%, compared to 4% in Fairfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Manheim.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield Manheim
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 11.3%
Depression 20.1% 23.4%
Smoking 17.1% 18.0%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 17.9%
Obesity 36.6% 35.4%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Manheim

  • In Manheim, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Manheim at 23.4% versus 20.1% in Fairfield.
  • Manheim has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 17.9% in Manheim.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 36.6% compared to 35.4% in Manheim.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 11.0% in Manheim.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield Manheim
No Schooling 0.1% (6) 0.8% (38)
High School Diploma 12.1% (1,145) 22.8% (1,142)
Less than High School 6.3% (594) 9.5% (474)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.1% (3,604) 19.6% (983)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Manheim

  • In Manheim, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
  • In Manheim, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.8% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Manheim at 9.5%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 19.6% in Manheim.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.