Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs La puente, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs La puente, CA.
Data | Fairfield | La puente |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,464 | 36,636 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $44,277 | $77,702 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.9 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs La puente
- The population in La puente is higher at 36,636, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 36.4 years in La puente.
- La puente has a higher median income of $77,702, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In La puente, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield and La puente at 12%.
- La puente has a higher unemployment rate at 5.9% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs La puente provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairfield | La puente |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 2 |
White | 73 | -16 |
Asian | 9 | 14 |
Hispanic | 5 | 84 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs La puente
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 8% compared to 2% in La puente.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to -16% in La puente.
- In La puente, the Asian population stands at 14%, greater than 9% in Fairfield.
- La puente has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 84%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in La puente at 13%, compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- In La puente, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 1% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairfield | La puente |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 13.4% |
Depression | 20.1% | 15.3% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 11.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 31.6% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs La puente
- In La puente, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.1% compared to 15.3% in La puente.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 17.1% compared to 11.8% in La puente.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 14.5% in La puente.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 36.6% compared to 31.6% in La puente.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in La puente.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairfield | La puente |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 5.0% (1,841) |
High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 18.6% (6,830) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 44.3% (16,244) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 8.0% (2,926) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs La puente
- In La puente, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 5.0% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In La puente, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.6% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in La puente at 44.3%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 8.0% in La puente.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.