Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs La crosse, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs La crosse, WI.
| Data | Fairfield | La crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,464 | 51,380 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 30.0 years |
| Median Income | $44,277 | $51,836 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs La crosse
- The population in La crosse is higher at 51,380, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 30.0 years in La crosse.
- La crosse has a higher median income of $51,836, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 32.0% compared to 26.0% in La crosse.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in La crosse.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in La crosse.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs La crosse provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | La crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 2 |
| White | 73 | 88 |
| Asian | 9 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 4 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs La crosse
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 8% compared to 2% in La crosse.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in La crosse at 88% compared to 73% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 4% in La crosse.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 5% compared to 2% in La crosse.
- Both Fairfield and La crosse have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 4%.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in La crosse.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | La crosse |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.5% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 16.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 23.1% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs La crosse
- In La crosse, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in La crosse at 25.7% versus 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 17.1% compared to 16.8% in La crosse.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in La crosse at 23.1% compared to 19.8% in Fairfield.
- La crosse has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 36.6% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in La crosse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | La crosse |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.5% (232) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 13.6% (6,986) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 5.3% (2,721) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 20.8% (10,707) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs La crosse
- In La crosse, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In La crosse, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 6.3% compared to 5.3% in La crosse.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 20.8% in La crosse.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.