Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Island park, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Island park, NY.
| Data | Fairfield | Island park |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,464 | 4,969 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 42.7 years |
| Median Income | $44,277 | $96,875 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 6% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Island park
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 9,464, compared to 4,969 in Island park.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 42.7 years in Island park.
- Island park has a higher median income of $96,875, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In Island park, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 6% in Island park.
- Island park has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Island park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Island park |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 1 |
| White | 73 | 56 |
| Asian | 9 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 5 | 33 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 6 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Island park
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 8% compared to 1% in Island park.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 56% in Island park.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 4% in Island park.
- Island park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 33%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Island park at 6%, compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Island park.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Island park |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 14.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 9.8% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 17.4% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Island park
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.6% in Island park.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.1% compared to 17.4% in Island park.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 17.1% compared to 14.1% in Island park.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 17.9% in Island park.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 36.6% compared to 29.5% in Island park.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 8.0% in Island park.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Island park |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.5% (27) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 27.9% (1,388) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 8.9% (443) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 16.5% (819) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Island park
- In Island park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Island park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Island park at 8.9%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 16.5% in Island park.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.