Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Hughesville, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Hughesville, PA.
Data | Fairfield | Hughesville |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,464 | 2,133 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 41.0 years |
Median Income | $44,277 | $65,897 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 52.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Hughesville
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 9,464, compared to 2,133 in Hughesville.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 41.0 years in Hughesville.
- Hughesville has a higher median income of $65,897, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In Hughesville, the percentage of married families is higher at 52.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 7% in Hughesville.
- Hughesville has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Hughesville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairfield | Hughesville |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 1 |
White | 73 | 89 |
Asian | 9 | 1 |
Hispanic | 5 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Hughesville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 8% compared to 1% in Hughesville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hughesville at 89% compared to 73% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 1% in Hughesville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 5% compared to 4% in Hughesville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hughesville at 5%, compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Hughesville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairfield | Hughesville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 10.9% |
Depression | 20.1% | 23.9% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 17.8% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 35.0% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Hughesville
- In Hughesville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hughesville at 23.9% versus 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Hughesville has a higher smoking rate at 17.8% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 18.5% in Hughesville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 36.6% compared to 35.0% in Hughesville.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fairfield and Hughesville at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairfield | Hughesville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 1.2% (26) |
High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 28.1% (600) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 16.1% (344) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 21.8% (465) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Hughesville
- In Hughesville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.2% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Hughesville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.1% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hughesville at 16.1%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 21.8% in Hughesville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.