Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Garden city, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Garden city, KS.
Data | Fairfield | Garden city |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,464 | 27,519 |
Median Age | 43.0 years | 32.3 years |
Median Income | $44,277 | $67,500 |
Married Families | 32.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Garden city
- The population in Garden city is higher at 27,519, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 32.3 years in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher median income of $67,500, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In Garden city, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield and Garden city at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Garden city.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Garden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairfield | Garden city |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | 6 |
White | 73 | 16 |
Asian | 9 | 5 |
Hispanic | 5 | 55 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Garden city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 8% compared to 6% in Garden city.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 16% in Garden city.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 5% in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garden city at 18%, compared to 4% in Fairfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Garden city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairfield | Garden city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 15.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.8% |
Depression | 20.1% | 18.2% |
Smoking | 17.1% | 18.5% |
Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 17.7% |
Obesity | 36.6% | 38.7% |
Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Garden city
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 15.3% in Garden city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.1% compared to 18.2% in Garden city.
- Garden city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Garden city.
- Garden city has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 36.6% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fairfield and Garden city at 13.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairfield | Garden city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 3.5% (967) |
High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 10.9% (2,993) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 34.9% (9,615) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 11.0% (3,034) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Garden city
- In Garden city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 12.1% compared to 10.9% in Garden city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garden city at 34.9%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 11.0% in Garden city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.