Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Garden city, KS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Garden city, KS.

Data Fairfield Garden city
Population 9,464 27,519
Median Age 43.0 years 32.3 years
Median Income $44,277 $67,500
Married Families 32.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Garden city

  • The population in Garden city is higher at 27,519, compared to 9,464 in Fairfield.
  • Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 32.3 years in Garden city.
  • Garden city has a higher median income of $67,500, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
  • In Garden city, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield and Garden city at 12%.
  • The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Garden city.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield vs Garden city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield Garden city
Black 8 6
White 73 16
Asian 9 5
Hispanic 5 55
Two or More Races 4 18
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Garden city

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 8% compared to 6% in Garden city.
  • Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 73% compared to 16% in Garden city.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 5% in Garden city.
  • Garden city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 55%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Garden city at 18%, compared to 4% in Fairfield.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Garden city.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield Garden city
Mental Health Not Good 15.5% 15.3%
Physical Health Not Good 10.1% 11.8%
Depression 20.1% 18.2%
Smoking 17.1% 18.5%
Binge Drinking 19.8% 17.7%
Obesity 36.6% 38.7%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Garden city

  • More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 15.3% in Garden city.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.1% compared to 18.2% in Garden city.
  • Garden city has a higher smoking rate at 18.5% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 17.7% in Garden city.
  • Garden city has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 36.6% in Fairfield.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Fairfield and Garden city at 13.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield Garden city
No Schooling 0.1% (6) 3.5% (967)
High School Diploma 12.1% (1,145) 10.9% (2,993)
Less than High School 6.3% (594) 34.9% (9,615)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 38.1% (3,604) 11.0% (3,034)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Garden city

  • In Garden city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.5% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 12.1% compared to 10.9% in Garden city.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Garden city at 34.9%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 11.0% in Garden city.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.