Demographics details for Fairfield, IA vs Crandall, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, IA vs Crandall, TX.
| Data | Fairfield | Crandall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,464 | 4,641 |
| Median Age | 43.0 years | 37.3 years |
| Median Income | $44,277 | $101,829 |
| Married Families | 32.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Crandall
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 9,464, compared to 4,641 in Crandall.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 43.0 years compared to 37.3 years in Crandall.
- Crandall has a higher median income of $101,829, compared to $44,277 in Fairfield.
- In Crandall, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 32.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Crandall.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Fairfield and Crandall at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Crandall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Crandall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 3 |
| White | 73 | 75 |
| Asian | 9 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 5 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Crandall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 8% compared to 3% in Crandall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Crandall at 75% compared to 73% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 9% compared to 0% in Crandall.
- Crandall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 4% compared to 3% in Crandall.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Fairfield at 1% compared to 0% in Crandall.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Crandall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.5% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.1% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 20.1% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 17.1% | 17.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.8% | 19.7% |
| Obesity | 36.6% | 34.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Crandall
- In Crandall, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.5% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Crandall at 25.2% versus 20.1% in Fairfield.
- Crandall has a higher smoking rate at 17.6% compared to 17.1% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 19.8% compared to 19.7% in Crandall.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 36.6% compared to 34.3% in Crandall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 13.0% compared to 7.0% in Crandall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Crandall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (6) | 0.8% (37) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (1,145) | 13.4% (622) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (594) | 9.0% (420) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.1% (3,604) | 12.8% (594) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Crandall
- In Crandall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Fairfield.
- In Crandall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.4% compared to 12.1% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Crandall at 9.0%, compared to 6.3% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.1% compared to 12.8% in Crandall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.