Demographics details for Fairfield, CT vs Washington, MO

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CT vs Washington, MO.

Data Fairfield Washington
Population 62,105 15,075
Median Age 42.0 years 40.9 years
Median Income $102,000 $75,127
Married Families Data is updating 41.0%
Poverty Level 5% 8%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 2.5

Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Washington

  • In Fairfield, the population is higher at 62,105, compared to 15,075 in Washington.
  • Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 40.9 years in Washington.
  • Fairfield has a higher median income of $102,000 compared to $75,127 in Washington.
  • In Washington, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Washington at 8%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
  • The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 2.9%, compared to 2.5% in Washington.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield vs Washington provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield Washington
Black 5 Data is updating
White 80 91
Asian 7 Data is updating
Hispanic 8 2
Two or More Races Data is updating 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Washington

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 5% compared to 0% in Washington.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Washington at 91% compared to 80% in Fairfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 7% compared to 0% in Washington.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 8% compared to 2% in Washington.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Washington at 7%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Washington at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield Washington
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 11.0%
Depression Data is updating% 24.6%
Smoking Data is updating% 18.3%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 19.8%
Obesity Data is updating% 36.6%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Washington

  • In Washington, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Washington at 24.6% versus 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Washington has a higher smoking rate at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Washington at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Washington has higher obesity rates at 36.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Washington at 14.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield Washington
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (41)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 15.0% (2,260)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 8.7% (1,311)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 18.8% (2,838)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Washington

  • In Washington, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • In Washington, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Washington at 8.7%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • In Washington, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.