Demographics details for Fairfield, CT vs Picayune, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CT vs Picayune, MS.
| Data | Fairfield | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,105 | 11,826 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $102,000 | $35,649 |
| Married Families | Data is updating | 27.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 21% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Picayune
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 62,105, compared to 11,826 in Picayune.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 38.3 years in Picayune.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $102,000 compared to $35,649 in Picayune.
- In Picayune, the percentage of married families is higher at 27.0%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Picayune at 21%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- Picayune has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.9% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Picayune provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 38 |
| White | 80 | 55 |
| Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 8 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Picayune
- In Picayune, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 55% in Picayune.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 7% compared to 0% in Picayune.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 8% compared to 2% in Picayune.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Picayune at 5%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Picayune at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 14.3% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 23.3% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 13.3% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 44.0% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Picayune at 24.0% versus 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Picayune has a higher smoking rate at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Picayune at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Picayune has higher obesity rates at 44.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Picayune at 21.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Picayune |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (73) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 17.8% (2,108) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 11.8% (1,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 10.1% (1,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Picayune
- In Picayune, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- In Picayune, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Picayune at 11.8%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- In Picayune, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.