Demographics details for Fairfield, CT vs Oakland park, FL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CT vs Oakland park, FL.

Data Fairfield Oakland park
Population 62,105 43,824
Median Age 42.0 years 39.1 years
Median Income $102,000 $64,989
Married Families Data is updating 30.0%
Poverty Level 5% 14%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 3.1

Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Oakland park

  • In Fairfield, the population is higher at 62,105, compared to 43,824 in Oakland park.
  • Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 39.1 years in Oakland park.
  • Fairfield has a higher median income of $102,000 compared to $64,989 in Oakland park.
  • In Oakland park, the percentage of married families is higher at 30.0%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Oakland park at 14%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
  • Oakland park has a higher unemployment rate at 3.1% compared to 2.9% in Fairfield.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield vs Oakland park provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield Oakland park
Black 5 29
White 80 20
Asian 7 2
Hispanic 8 32
Two or More Races Data is updating 17
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Oakland park

  • In Oakland park, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 20% in Oakland park.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 7% compared to 2% in Oakland park.
  • Oakland park has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 32%, compared to 8% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oakland park at 17%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Oakland park at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield Oakland park
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 16.3%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 12.2%
Depression Data is updating% 17.8%
Smoking Data is updating% 20.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 15.0%
Obesity Data is updating% 31.1%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Oakland park

  • In Oakland park, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Oakland park at 17.8% versus 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Oakland park has a higher smoking rate at 20.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Oakland park at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Oakland park has higher obesity rates at 31.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Oakland park at 11.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield Oakland park
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.4% (596)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 19.8% (8,695)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 16.2% (7,092)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 20.7% (9,073)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Oakland park

  • In Oakland park, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.4% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • In Oakland park, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Oakland park at 16.2%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • In Oakland park, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.