Demographics details for Fairfield, CT vs Idyllwild, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CT vs Idyllwild, CA.

Data Fairfield Idyllwild
Population 62,105 3,491
Median Age 42.0 years 49.2 years
Median Income $102,000 $86,442
Married Families Data is updating 42.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 4.5

Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Idyllwild

  • In Fairfield, the population is higher at 62,105, compared to 3,491 in Idyllwild.
  • The median age in Idyllwild is higher at 49.2 years, compared to 42.0 years in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher median income of $102,000 compared to $86,442 in Idyllwild.
  • In Idyllwild, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • The poverty level is higher in Idyllwild at 12%, compared to 5% in Fairfield.
  • Idyllwild has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.9% in Fairfield.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield vs Idyllwild provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield Idyllwild
Black 5 2
White 80 63
Asian 7 5
Hispanic 8 26
Two or More Races Data is updating 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Idyllwild

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 5% compared to 2% in Idyllwild.
  • Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 63% in Idyllwild.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 7% compared to 5% in Idyllwild.
  • Idyllwild has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 26%, compared to 8% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Idyllwild at 4%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Idyllwild at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield Idyllwild
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.5%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 9.9%
Depression Data is updating% 18.5%
Smoking Data is updating% 12.1%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 18.4%
Obesity Data is updating% 33.2%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Idyllwild

  • In Idyllwild, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Idyllwild at 18.5% versus 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Idyllwild has a higher smoking rate at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Idyllwild at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Idyllwild has higher obesity rates at 33.2% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Idyllwild at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield Idyllwild
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 1.9% (68)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.1% (423)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 11.4% (398)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 31.9% (1,115)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Idyllwild

  • In Idyllwild, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.9% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • In Idyllwild, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.1% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Idyllwild at 11.4%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • In Idyllwild, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.9% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.