Demographics details for Fairfield, CT vs Fishers, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CT vs Fishers, IN.
| Data | Fairfield | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 62,105 | 101,966 |
| Median Age | 42.0 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $102,000 | $126,548 |
| Married Families | Data is updating | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.9 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Fishers
- The population in Fishers is higher at 101,966, compared to 62,105 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 37.1 years in Fishers.
- Fishers has a higher median income of $126,548, compared to $102,000 in Fairfield.
- In Fishers, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield and Fishers at 5%.
- Fishers has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 2.9% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Fishers provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 5 |
| White | 80 | 80 |
| Asian | 7 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 8 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Fishers
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Fairfield and Fishers at 5%.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Fairfield and Fishers at 80%.
- In Fishers, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 7% in Fairfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 8% compared to 3% in Fishers.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fishers at 4%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Fishers at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 12.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 7.1% |
| Depression | Data is updating% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | Data is updating% | 9.4% |
| Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 17.0% |
| Obesity | Data is updating% | 27.8% |
| Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Fishers
- In Fishers, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 12.5% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fishers at 22.2% versus 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Fishers has a higher smoking rate at 9.4% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fishers at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- Fishers has higher obesity rates at 27.8% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fishers at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Fishers |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.4% (418) |
| High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 6.5% (6,652) |
| Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 2.0% (2,037) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 41.2% (42,051) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Fishers
- In Fishers, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- In Fishers, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 6.5% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fishers at 2.0%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
- In Fishers, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.