Demographics details for Fairfield, CT vs Clayton, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CT vs Clayton, NC.

Data Fairfield Clayton
Population 62,105 29,445
Median Age 42.0 years 32.6 years
Median Income $102,000 $71,698
Married Families Data is updating 35.0%
Poverty Level 5% 5%
Unemployment Rate 2.9 3.7

Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Clayton

  • In Fairfield, the population is higher at 62,105, compared to 29,445 in Clayton.
  • Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 42.0 years compared to 32.6 years in Clayton.
  • Fairfield has a higher median income of $102,000 compared to $71,698 in Clayton.
  • In Clayton, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield and Clayton at 5%.
  • Clayton has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 2.9% in Fairfield.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield vs Clayton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield Clayton
Black 5 22
White 80 59
Asian 7 1
Hispanic 8 13
Two or More Races Data is updating 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Clayton

  • In Clayton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 22% compared to 5% in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 80% compared to 59% in Clayton.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 7% compared to 1% in Clayton.
  • Clayton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 8% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Clayton at 5%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Clayton at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield Clayton
Mental Health Not Good Data is updating% 15.6%
Physical Health Not Good Data is updating% 10.4%
Depression Data is updating% 23.1%
Smoking Data is updating% 15.2%
Binge Drinking Data is updating% 17.6%
Obesity Data is updating% 39.9%
Disability Percentage Data is updating% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Clayton

  • In Clayton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Clayton at 23.1% versus 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Clayton has a higher smoking rate at 15.2% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Clayton at 17.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • Clayton has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Clayton at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield Clayton
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.7% (210)
High School Diploma 0.0% (Data is updating) 12.6% (3,700)
Less than High School 0.0% (Data is updating) 5.4% (1,598)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 0.0% (Data is updating) 18.6% (5,471)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Clayton

  • In Clayton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • In Clayton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 12.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Clayton at 5.4%, compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.
  • In Clayton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.6% compared to 0.0% in Fairfield.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.