Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Vernon, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Vernon, TX.
| Data | Fairfield | Vernon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 9,745 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $47,528 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 33.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 19% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Vernon
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 9,745 in Vernon.
- The median age in Vernon is higher at 36.7 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $47,528 in Vernon.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 39.0% compared to 33.0% in Vernon.
- The poverty level is higher in Vernon at 19%, compared to 12% in Fairfield.
- Vernon has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 5.1% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Vernon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Vernon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 8 |
| White | 23 | 37 |
| Asian | 18 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 35 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Vernon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 8% in Vernon.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Vernon at 37% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 4% in Vernon.
- Vernon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 35%, compared to 30% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Vernon at 15%, compared to 14% in Fairfield.
- In Vernon, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Vernon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 25.2% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 41.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Vernon
- In Vernon, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Vernon at 25.2% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Vernon has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Vernon at 16.7% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Vernon has higher obesity rates at 41.1% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Vernon at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Vernon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 2.0% (196) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 18.4% (1,796) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 28.4% (2,763) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 10.0% (976) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Vernon
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 2.0% in Vernon.
- In Vernon, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Vernon at 28.4%, compared to 14.6% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 10.0% in Vernon.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.