Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Sioux falls, SD
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Sioux falls, SD.
Data | Fairfield | Sioux falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 119,338 | 202,078 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 34.9 years |
Median Income | $98,857 | $71,785 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 2.0 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Sioux falls
- The population in Sioux falls is higher at 202,078, compared to 119,338 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 34.9 years in Sioux falls.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $71,785 in Sioux falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 39.0% compared to 37.0% in Sioux falls.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Sioux falls.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 2.0% in Sioux falls.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Sioux falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairfield | Sioux falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 7 |
White | 23 | 78 |
Asian | 18 | 2 |
Hispanic | 30 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 6 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Sioux falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 7% in Sioux falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sioux falls at 78% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 2% in Sioux falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 5% in Sioux falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 6% in Sioux falls.
- In Sioux falls, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairfield | Sioux falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 13.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 8.8% |
Depression | 17.7% | 19.4% |
Smoking | 11.9% | 16.0% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 21.6% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 35.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Sioux falls
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 13.3% in Sioux falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sioux falls at 19.4% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Sioux falls has a higher smoking rate at 16.0% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sioux falls at 21.6% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Sioux falls has higher obesity rates at 35.8% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Sioux falls.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairfield | Sioux falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 0.8% (1,619) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 13.1% (26,548) |
Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 7.3% (14,743) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 23.3% (47,034) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Sioux falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Sioux falls.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 13.1% in Sioux falls.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 7.3% in Sioux falls.
- In Sioux falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 23.3% compared to 18.3% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.