Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Rittman, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Rittman, OH.
| Data | Fairfield | Rittman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 6,115 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $61,331 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 41.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Rittman
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 6,115 in Rittman.
- The median age in Rittman is higher at 36.5 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $61,331 in Rittman.
- In Rittman, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Rittman.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Rittman.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Rittman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Rittman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 23 | 95 |
| Asian | 18 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Rittman
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 1% in Rittman.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Rittman at 95% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 1% in Rittman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 2% in Rittman.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 1% in Rittman.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Rittman at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Rittman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 25.6% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.6% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Rittman
- In Rittman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Rittman at 25.6% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Rittman has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Rittman at 18.6% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Rittman has higher obesity rates at 38.8% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Rittman at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Rittman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 2.3% (139) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 23.5% (1,436) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 13.8% (841) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 14.0% (856) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Rittman
- In Rittman, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.3% compared to 2.1% in Fairfield.
- In Rittman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 13.8% in Rittman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 14.0% in Rittman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.