Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Powder springs, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Powder springs, GA.
| Data | Fairfield | Powder springs |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 17,337 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $88,311 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Powder springs
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 17,337 in Powder springs.
- The median age in Powder springs is higher at 38.7 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $88,311 in Powder springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 39.0% compared to 36.0% in Powder springs.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield and Powder springs at 12%.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Powder springs.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Powder springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Powder springs |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 51 |
| White | 23 | 22 |
| Asian | 18 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Powder springs
- In Powder springs, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 51% compared to 15% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 23% compared to 22% in Powder springs.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 2% in Powder springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 19% in Powder springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 5% in Powder springs.
- In Powder springs, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Powder springs |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 10.7% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 14.4% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 33.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Powder springs
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Powder springs.
- Both cities have comparable depression rates at 17.7%.
- Powder springs has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 16.1% compared to 14.4% in Powder springs.
- Powder springs has higher obesity rates at 33.0% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 11.0% in Powder springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Powder springs |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 1.3% (225) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 15.0% (2,598) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 7.6% (1,309) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 26.3% (4,561) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Powder springs
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.3% in Powder springs.
- In Powder springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.0% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 7.6% in Powder springs.
- In Powder springs, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.3% compared to 18.3% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.