Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Mount hermon, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Mount hermon, LA.

Data Fairfield Mount hermon
Population 119,338 118
Median Age 35.8 years 43.0 years
Median Income $98,857 $49,500
Married Families 39.0% 27.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 5.0

Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Mount hermon

  • In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 118 in Mount hermon.
  • The median age in Mount hermon is higher at 43.0 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $49,500 in Mount hermon.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 39.0% compared to 27.0% in Mount hermon.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield and Mount hermon at 12%.
  • The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 5.0% in Mount hermon.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield vs Mount hermon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield Mount hermon
Black 15 Data is updating
White 23 97
Asian 18 Data is updating
Hispanic 30 2
Two or More Races 14 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Mount hermon

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 0% in Mount hermon.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Mount hermon at 97% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 0% in Mount hermon.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 2% in Mount hermon.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 1% in Mount hermon.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Mount hermon at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield Mount hermon
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% Data is updating%
Depression 17.7% Data is updating%
Smoking 11.9% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.1% Data is updating%
Obesity 30.1% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 12.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Mount hermon

  • More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 11.9% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield at 16.1% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 30.1% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield Mount hermon
No Schooling 2.1% (2,515) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.7% (16,358) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 14.6% (17,464) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.3% (21,856) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Mount hermon

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 0.0% in Mount hermon.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.