Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Mckinney, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Mckinney, TX.
| Data | Fairfield | Mckinney |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 207,507 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 36.9 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $113,286 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.4 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Mckinney
- The population in Mckinney is higher at 207,507, compared to 119,338 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Mckinney is higher at 36.9 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Mckinney has a higher median income of $113,286, compared to $98,857 in Fairfield.
- In Mckinney, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Mckinney.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.4% in Mckinney.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Mckinney provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Mckinney |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 11 |
| White | 23 | 52 |
| Asian | 18 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Mckinney
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 11% in Mckinney.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mckinney at 52% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 11% in Mckinney.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 16% in Mckinney.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 9% in Mckinney.
- In Mckinney, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Mckinney |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 9.7% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 12.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 29.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Mckinney
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.0% in Mckinney.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mckinney at 22.1% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Mckinney has a higher smoking rate at 12.2% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Mckinney at 18.0% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 30.1% compared to 29.3% in Mckinney.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 6.0% in Mckinney.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Mckinney |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 0.4% (916) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 8.2% (16,929) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 5.5% (11,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 31.6% (65,610) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Mckinney
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.4% in Mckinney.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 13.7% compared to 8.2% in Mckinney.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 5.5% in Mckinney.
- In Mckinney, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.6% compared to 18.3% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.