Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Lucernemines, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Lucernemines, PA.
| Data | Fairfield | Lucernemines |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 881 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 39.3 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $67,135 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Lucernemines
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 881 in Lucernemines.
- The median age in Lucernemines is higher at 39.3 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $67,135 in Lucernemines.
- In Lucernemines, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Lucernemines.
- Lucernemines has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 5.1% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Lucernemines provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Lucernemines |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | Data is updating |
| White | 23 | 99 |
| Asian | 18 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Lucernemines
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Lucernemines at 99% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 0% in Lucernemines.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 1% in Lucernemines.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Lucernemines at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Lucernemines |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 12.1% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 20.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 18.9% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Lucernemines
- In Lucernemines, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lucernemines at 23.9% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Lucernemines has a higher smoking rate at 20.4% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lucernemines at 18.9% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Lucernemines has higher obesity rates at 39.2% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 8.0% in Lucernemines.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Lucernemines |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 0.1% (1) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 20.9% (184) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 0.2% (2) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 8.6% (76) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Lucernemines
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.1% in Lucernemines.
- In Lucernemines, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.9% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 0.2% in Lucernemines.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 8.6% in Lucernemines.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.