Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Long prairie, MN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Long prairie, MN.

Data Fairfield Long prairie
Population 119,338 3,704
Median Age 35.8 years 39.9 years
Median Income $98,857 $60,313
Married Families 39.0% 40.0%
Poverty Level 12% 10%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Long prairie

  • In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 3,704 in Long prairie.
  • The median age in Long prairie is higher at 39.9 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $60,313 in Long prairie.
  • In Long prairie, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
  • Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Long prairie.
  • The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Long prairie.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield vs Long prairie provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield Long prairie
Black 15 1
White 23 45
Asian 18 2
Hispanic 30 34
Two or More Races 14 18
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Long prairie

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 1% in Long prairie.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Long prairie at 45% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 2% in Long prairie.
  • Long prairie has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 30% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Long prairie at 18%, compared to 14% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Long prairie at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield Long prairie
Mental Health Not Good 15.8% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 11.0%
Depression 17.7% 23.0%
Smoking 11.9% 20.2%
Binge Drinking 16.1% 19.2%
Obesity 30.1% 39.9%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 13.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Long prairie

  • More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.7% in Long prairie.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Long prairie at 23.0% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
  • Long prairie has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Long prairie at 19.2% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
  • Long prairie has higher obesity rates at 39.9% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Long prairie at 13.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield Long prairie
No Schooling 2.1% (2,515) 1.2% (45)
High School Diploma 13.7% (16,358) 26.9% (996)
Less than High School 14.6% (17,464) 30.8% (1,140)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.3% (21,856) 7.1% (264)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Long prairie

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.2% in Long prairie.
  • In Long prairie, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 26.9% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Long prairie at 30.8%, compared to 14.6% in Fairfield.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 7.1% in Long prairie.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.