Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Kingsland, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Kingsland, TX.
| Data | Fairfield | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 7,075 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 52.3 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $54,366 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Kingsland
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 7,075 in Kingsland.
- The median age in Kingsland is higher at 52.3 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $54,366 in Kingsland.
- In Kingsland, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Kingsland.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Kingsland.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Kingsland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 1 |
| White | 23 | 67 |
| Asian | 18 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Kingsland
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 1% in Kingsland.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kingsland at 67% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 1% in Kingsland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 19% in Kingsland.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 12% in Kingsland.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Kingsland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 20.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 14.1% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 26.8% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 38.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Kingsland
- In Kingsland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.1% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kingsland at 26.8% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Kingsland has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kingsland at 17.9% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Kingsland has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kingsland at 24.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 1.3% (94) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 19.3% (1,363) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 22.2% (1,568) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 18.7% (1,325) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Kingsland
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.3% in Kingsland.
- In Kingsland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kingsland at 22.2%, compared to 14.6% in Fairfield.
- In Kingsland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 18.3% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.