Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Kings mountain, NC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Kings mountain, NC.
| Data | Fairfield | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 11,638 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $45,301 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Kings mountain
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 11,638 in Kings mountain.
- The median age in Kings mountain is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $45,301 in Kings mountain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 39.0% compared to 24.0% in Kings mountain.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 11% in Kings mountain.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.2% in Kings mountain.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Kings mountain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 25 |
| White | 23 | 68 |
| Asian | 18 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 25% compared to 15% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kings mountain at 68% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 2% in Kings mountain.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 3% in Kings mountain.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Kings mountain at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 18.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 20.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.3% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Kings mountain
- In Kings mountain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.3% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kings mountain at 25.7% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Kings mountain has a higher smoking rate at 20.9% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kings mountain at 16.3% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Kings mountain has higher obesity rates at 38.0% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Kings mountain at 14.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Kings mountain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 0.4% (43) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 21.7% (2,528) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 17.8% (2,071) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 11.6% (1,353) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Kings mountain
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.4% in Kings mountain.
- In Kings mountain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.7% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Kings mountain at 17.8%, compared to 14.6% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 11.6% in Kings mountain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.