Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Joliet, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Joliet, IL.
| Data | Fairfield | Joliet |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 150,033 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 34.3 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $84,971 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Joliet
- The population in Joliet is higher at 150,033, compared to 119,338 in Fairfield.
- Residents in Fairfield have a higher median age of 35.8 years compared to 34.3 years in Joliet.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $84,971 in Joliet.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Joliet.
- The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield and Joliet at 12%.
- Joliet has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 5.1% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Joliet provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Joliet |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | 17 |
| White | 23 | 36 |
| Asian | 18 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 30 | 34 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Joliet
- In Joliet, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 15% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Joliet at 36% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 2% in Joliet.
- Joliet has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 34%, compared to 30% in Fairfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 10% in Joliet.
- In Joliet, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Joliet |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.7% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 19.1% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 16.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Joliet
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.7% in Joliet.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Joliet at 19.1% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Joliet has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Joliet at 16.2% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Joliet has higher obesity rates at 37.4% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 9.0% in Joliet.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Joliet |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 1.5% (2,247) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 14.9% (22,362) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 17.5% (26,199) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 15.6% (23,354) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Joliet
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.5% in Joliet.
- In Joliet, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Joliet at 17.5%, compared to 14.6% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 15.6% in Joliet.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.