Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Fergus falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Fergus falls, MN.
Data | Fairfield | Fergus falls |
---|---|---|
Population | 119,338 | 14,187 |
Median Age | 35.8 years | 42.0 years |
Median Income | $98,857 | $48,738 |
Married Families | 39.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Fergus falls
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 14,187 in Fergus falls.
- The median age in Fergus falls is higher at 42.0 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $48,738 in Fergus falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield at 39.0% compared to 35.0% in Fergus falls.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 9% in Fergus falls.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.2% in Fergus falls.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Fergus falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairfield | Fergus falls |
---|---|---|
Black | 15 | 1 |
White | 23 | 93 |
Asian | 18 | 1 |
Hispanic | 30 | 1 |
Two or More Races | 14 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Fergus falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fergus falls at 93% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 1% in Fergus falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 4% in Fergus falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Fergus falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairfield | Fergus falls |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 15.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 9.8% |
Depression | 17.7% | 24.4% |
Smoking | 11.9% | 17.9% |
Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 19.3% |
Obesity | 30.1% | 36.8% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Fergus falls
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 15.8% compared to 15.6% in Fergus falls.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fergus falls at 24.4% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Fergus falls has a higher smoking rate at 17.9% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Fergus falls at 19.3% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Fergus falls has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fergus falls at 19.0% compared to 12.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairfield | Fergus falls |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 0.8% (117) |
High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 14.4% (2,039) |
Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 8.3% (1,171) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 18.7% (2,656) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Fergus falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Fergus falls.
- In Fergus falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.4% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 8.3% in Fergus falls.
- In Fergus falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.7% compared to 18.3% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.