Demographics details for Fairfield, CA vs Cedar lake, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, CA vs Cedar lake, IN.
| Data | Fairfield | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119,338 | 15,592 |
| Median Age | 35.8 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $98,857 | $84,444 |
| Married Families | 39.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Cedar lake
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 119,338, compared to 15,592 in Cedar lake.
- The median age in Cedar lake is higher at 39.5 years, compared to 35.8 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $98,857 compared to $84,444 in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, the percentage of married families is higher at 40.0%, compared to 39.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 5% in Cedar lake.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Cedar lake.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Cedar lake provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 15 | Data is updating |
| White | 23 | 94 |
| Asian | 18 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 30 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 14 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 15% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar lake at 94% compared to 23% in Fairfield.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield at 18% compared to 0% in Cedar lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield at 30% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield at 14% compared to 3% in Cedar lake.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Cedar lake at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.8% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 17.7% | 25.4% |
| Smoking | 11.9% | 18.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.1% | 19.8% |
| Obesity | 30.1% | 37.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Cedar lake
- In Cedar lake, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 15.8% in Fairfield.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar lake at 25.4% versus 17.7% in Fairfield.
- Cedar lake has a higher smoking rate at 18.8% compared to 11.9% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar lake at 19.8% compared to 16.1% in Fairfield.
- Cedar lake has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 30.1% in Fairfield.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 12.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar lake.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Cedar lake |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (2,515) | 0.4% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 13.7% (16,358) | 21.1% (3,292) |
| Less than High School | 14.6% (17,464) | 7.1% (1,102) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.3% (21,856) | 14.1% (2,204) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Cedar lake
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.4% in Cedar lake.
- In Cedar lake, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.1% compared to 13.7% in Fairfield.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 14.6% compared to 7.1% in Cedar lake.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.3% compared to 14.1% in Cedar lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.