Demographics details for Fairfield, AL vs Temple city, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, AL vs Temple city, CA.
Data | Fairfield | Temple city |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,690 | 35,296 |
Median Age | 30.7 years | 42.9 years |
Median Income | $45,646 | $95,263 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Temple city
- The population in Temple city is higher at 35,296, compared to 9,690 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Temple city is higher at 42.9 years, compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Temple city has a higher median income of $95,263, compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- In Temple city, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 0% in Temple city.
- Temple city has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 5.0% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Temple city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairfield | Temple city |
---|---|---|
Black | 95 | Data is updating |
White | 3 | 7 |
Asian | Data is updating | 67 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 18 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Temple city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 95% compared to 0% in Temple city.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Temple city at 7% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- In Temple city, the Asian population stands at 67%, greater than 0% in Fairfield.
- Temple city has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Temple city at 8%, compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Temple city at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairfield | Temple city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 12.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 8.9% |
Depression | 19.6% | 12.6% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 9.3% |
Binge Drinking | 11.7% | 12.4% |
Obesity | 48.1% | 20.1% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Temple city
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 12.9% in Temple city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield at 19.6% compared to 12.6% in Temple city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.6% compared to 9.3% in Temple city.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Temple city at 12.4% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 48.1% compared to 20.1% in Temple city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 14.0% compared to 9.0% in Temple city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairfield | Temple city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (53) | 2.1% (724) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (2,159) | 14.7% (5,202) |
Less than High School | 3.1% (302) | 11.4% (4,037) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,437) | 30.7% (10,834) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Temple city
- In Temple city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.5% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 14.7% in Temple city.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Temple city at 11.4%, compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- In Temple city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.7% compared to 14.8% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.