Demographics details for Fairfield, AL vs Starke, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, AL vs Starke, FL.
| Data | Fairfield | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,690 | 5,864 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 35.1 years |
| Median Income | $45,646 | $42,976 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Starke
- In Fairfield, the population is higher at 9,690, compared to 5,864 in Starke.
- The median age in Starke is higher at 35.1 years, compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher median income of $45,646 compared to $42,976 in Starke.
- In Starke, the percentage of married families is higher at 25.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 15% in Starke.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.7% in Starke.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Starke provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 95 | 26 |
| White | 3 | 66 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Starke
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 95% compared to 26% in Starke.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Starke at 66% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- In Starke, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Fairfield and Starke at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Starke at 7%, compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Starke at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 19.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 26.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.7% | 14.7% |
| Obesity | 48.1% | 38.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Starke
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 19.3% in Starke.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Starke at 21.0% versus 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Starke has a higher smoking rate at 26.7% compared to 20.6% in Fairfield.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Starke at 14.7% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 48.1% compared to 38.8% in Starke.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Starke at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Fairfield.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Starke |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (53) | 0.1% (3) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (2,159) | 21.8% (1,278) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (302) | 12.6% (740) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,437) | 8.1% (475) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Starke
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.1% in Starke.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 21.8% in Starke.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Starke at 12.6%, compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 8.1% in Starke.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.