Demographics details for Fairfield, AL vs South jordan, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, AL vs South jordan, UT.
Data | Fairfield | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Population | 9,690 | 83,513 |
Median Age | 30.7 years | 34.4 years |
Median Income | $45,646 | $119,822 |
Married Families | 20.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 30% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.7 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs South jordan
- The population in South jordan is higher at 83,513, compared to 9,690 in Fairfield.
- The median age in South jordan is higher at 34.4 years, compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- South jordan has a higher median income of $119,822, compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- In South jordan, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 5% in South jordan.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.7% in South jordan.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs South jordan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Fairfield | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Black | 95 | Data is updating |
White | 3 | 83 |
Asian | Data is updating | 4 |
Hispanic | Data is updating | 7 |
Two or More Races | 2 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 95% compared to 0% in South jordan.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in South jordan at 83% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- In South jordan, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Fairfield.
- South jordan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South jordan at 5%, compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- In South jordan, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Fairfield | South jordan |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 16.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 9.0% |
Depression | 19.6% | 26.5% |
Smoking | 20.6% | 7.3% |
Binge Drinking | 11.7% | 16.9% |
Obesity | 48.1% | 28.6% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs South jordan
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 16.7% in South jordan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in South jordan at 26.5% versus 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.6% compared to 7.3% in South jordan.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in South jordan at 16.9% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 48.1% compared to 28.6% in South jordan.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in South jordan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Fairfield | South jordan |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (53) | 0.2% (172) |
High School Diploma | 22.3% (2,159) | 8.4% (6,995) |
Less than High School | 3.1% (302) | 2.7% (2,236) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,437) | 27.1% (22,648) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs South jordan
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.2% in South jordan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 8.4% in South jordan.
- More residents in Fairfield have less than a high school education at 3.1% compared to 2.7% in South jordan.
- In South jordan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 27.1% compared to 14.8% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.