Demographics details for Fairfield, AL vs Lawrence, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, AL vs Lawrence, MA.
| Data | Fairfield | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,690 | 87,954 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $45,646 | $53,977 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 26.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 7.1 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Lawrence
- The population in Lawrence is higher at 87,954, compared to 9,690 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Lawrence is higher at 31.5 years, compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Lawrence has a higher median income of $53,977, compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- In Lawrence, the percentage of married families is higher at 26.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 15% in Lawrence.
- Lawrence has a higher unemployment rate at 7.1% compared to 5.0% in Fairfield.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Lawrence provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 95 | 5 |
| White | 3 | -4 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 82 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Lawrence
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 95% compared to 5% in Lawrence.
- Fairfield has a higher percentage of White residents at 3% compared to -4% in Lawrence.
- In Lawrence, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fairfield.
- Lawrence has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 82%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lawrence at 15%, compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Lawrence at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 18.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.7% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 48.1% | 37.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Lawrence
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 18.9% in Lawrence.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lawrence at 22.4% versus 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.6% compared to 17.3% in Lawrence.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lawrence at 14.5% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 48.1% compared to 37.4% in Lawrence.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Fairfield and Lawrence at 14.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Lawrence |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (53) | 2.7% (2,366) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (2,159) | 18.6% (16,316) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (302) | 34.1% (29,963) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,437) | 9.2% (8,067) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Lawrence
- In Lawrence, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.5% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 18.6% in Lawrence.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lawrence at 34.1%, compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.8% compared to 9.2% in Lawrence.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.