Demographics details for Fairfield, AL vs Eureka, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield, AL vs Eureka, MO.
| Data | Fairfield | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 9,690 | 12,729 |
| Median Age | 30.7 years | 37.9 years |
| Median Income | $45,646 | $104,697 |
| Married Families | 20.0% | 42.0% |
| Poverty Level | 30% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield vs Eureka
- The population in Eureka is higher at 12,729, compared to 9,690 in Fairfield.
- The median age in Eureka is higher at 37.9 years, compared to 30.7 years in Fairfield.
- Eureka has a higher median income of $104,697, compared to $45,646 in Fairfield.
- In Eureka, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 20.0% in Fairfield.
- Fairfield has a higher poverty level at 30% compared to 5% in Eureka.
- The unemployment rate in Fairfield is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.2% in Eureka.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield vs Eureka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 95 | Data is updating |
| White | 3 | 88 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield at 95% compared to 0% in Eureka.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Eureka at 88% compared to 3% in Fairfield.
- In Eureka, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Fairfield.
- Eureka has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 2%, compared to 0% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Eureka at 8%, compared to 2% in Fairfield.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield and Eureka at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.7% | 14.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.2% | 8.7% |
| Depression | 19.6% | 22.8% |
| Smoking | 20.6% | 14.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 11.7% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 48.1% | 30.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield vs Eureka
- More residents in Fairfield report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 14.2% in Eureka.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Eureka at 22.8% versus 19.6% in Fairfield.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield at 20.6% compared to 14.1% in Eureka.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Eureka at 21.9% compared to 11.7% in Fairfield.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield at 48.1% compared to 30.0% in Eureka.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield at 14.0% compared to 7.0% in Eureka.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield | Eureka |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.5% (53) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 22.3% (2,159) | 10.5% (1,337) |
| Less than High School | 3.1% (302) | 3.2% (405) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.8% (1,437) | 30.1% (3,835) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield vs Eureka
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield have no formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Eureka.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield hold a high school diploma at 22.3% compared to 10.5% in Eureka.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Eureka at 3.2%, compared to 3.1% in Fairfield.
- In Eureka, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.1% compared to 14.8% in Fairfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.