Demographics details for Fairfield bay, AR vs Stockholm, WI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield bay, AR vs Stockholm, WI.

Data Fairfield bay Stockholm
Population 2,152 82
Median Age 68.2 years 69.8 years
Median Income $58,750 $62,500
Married Families 48.0% 84.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 3.5 2.5

Population Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Stockholm

  • In Fairfield bay, the population is higher at 2,152, compared to 82 in Stockholm.
  • The median age in Stockholm is higher at 69.8 years, compared to 68.2 years in Fairfield bay.
  • Stockholm has a higher median income of $62,500, compared to $58,750 in Fairfield bay.
  • In Stockholm, the percentage of married families is higher at 84.0%, compared to 48.0% in Fairfield bay.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Fairfield bay and Stockholm at 0%.
  • The unemployment rate in Fairfield bay is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.5% in Stockholm.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield bay vs Stockholm provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield bay Stockholm
Black 1 Data is updating
White 86 100
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 7 Data is updating
Two or More Races 5 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Stockholm

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Fairfield bay at 1% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Stockholm at 100% compared to 86% in Fairfield bay.
  • The Asian population is larger in Fairfield bay at 1% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield bay at 7% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield bay at 5% compared to 0% in Stockholm.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield bay and Stockholm at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield bay Stockholm
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% 11.8%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% 12.6%
Depression 27.1% 20.6%
Smoking 20.2% 16.4%
Binge Drinking 15.7% 19.3%
Obesity 37.3% 38.6%
Disability Percentage 32.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Stockholm

  • More residents in Fairfield bay report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 11.8% in Stockholm.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 27.1% compared to 20.6% in Stockholm.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 20.2% compared to 16.4% in Stockholm.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Stockholm at 19.3% compared to 15.7% in Fairfield bay.
  • Stockholm has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 37.3% in Fairfield bay.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield bay at 32.0% compared to 26.0% in Stockholm.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield bay Stockholm
No Schooling 0.2% (5) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 24.6% (529) 28.0% (23)
Less than High School 7.0% (151) 2.4% (2)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.9% (729) 64.6% (53)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Stockholm

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Stockholm.
  • In Stockholm, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.0% compared to 24.6% in Fairfield bay.
  • More residents in Fairfield bay have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 2.4% in Stockholm.
  • In Stockholm, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 64.6% compared to 33.9% in Fairfield bay.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.