Demographics details for Fairfield bay, AR vs Plymouth, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield bay, AR vs Plymouth, MA.

Data Fairfield bay Plymouth
Population 2,152 60,803
Median Age 68.2 years 42.0 years
Median Income $58,750 $82,400
Married Families 48.0% 55.0%
Poverty Level Data is updating 6%
Unemployment Rate 3.5 3.7

Population Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Plymouth

  • The population in Plymouth is higher at 60,803, compared to 2,152 in Fairfield bay.
  • Residents in Fairfield bay have a higher median age of 68.2 years compared to 42.0 years in Plymouth.
  • Plymouth has a higher median income of $82,400, compared to $58,750 in Fairfield bay.
  • In Plymouth, the percentage of married families is higher at 55.0%, compared to 48.0% in Fairfield bay.
  • The poverty level is higher in Plymouth at 6%, compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
  • Plymouth has a higher unemployment rate at 3.7% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield bay.

Demographics

Demographics Fairfield bay vs Plymouth provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Fairfield bay Plymouth
Black 1 8
White 86 85
Asian 1 3
Hispanic 7 4
Two or More Races 5 2
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Plymouth

  • In Plymouth, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
  • Fairfield bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 85% in Plymouth.
  • In Plymouth, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Fairfield bay.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Fairfield bay at 7% compared to 4% in Plymouth.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield bay at 5% compared to 2% in Plymouth.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield bay and Plymouth at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Fairfield bay Plymouth
Mental Health Not Good 19.1% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 12.7% Data is updating%
Depression 27.1% Data is updating%
Smoking 20.2% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 15.7% Data is updating%
Obesity 37.3% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 32.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Plymouth

  • More residents in Fairfield bay report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 27.1% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 20.2% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield bay at 15.7% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield bay at 37.3% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield bay at 32.0% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Fairfield bay Plymouth
No Schooling 0.2% (5) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 24.6% (529) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 7.0% (151) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 33.9% (729) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Plymouth

  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • More residents in Fairfield bay have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 0.0% in Plymouth.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.