Demographics details for Fairfield bay, AR vs Lodge, SC
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield bay, AR vs Lodge, SC.
| Data | Fairfield bay | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,152 | 84 |
| Median Age | 68.2 years | 39.5 years |
| Median Income | $58,750 | $34,938 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Lodge
- In Fairfield bay, the population is higher at 2,152, compared to 84 in Lodge.
- Residents in Fairfield bay have a higher median age of 68.2 years compared to 39.5 years in Lodge.
- Fairfield bay has a higher median income of $58,750 compared to $34,938 in Lodge.
- In Lodge, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 48.0% in Fairfield bay.
- The poverty level is higher in Lodge at 15%, compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
- Lodge has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield bay.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield bay vs Lodge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield bay | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 5 |
| White | 86 | 34 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 7 | 61 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Lodge
- In Lodge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
- Fairfield bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 34% in Lodge.
- The Asian population is larger in Fairfield bay at 1% compared to 0% in Lodge.
- Lodge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 7% in Fairfield bay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Fairfield bay at 5% compared to 0% in Lodge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Fairfield bay and Lodge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield bay | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 15.6% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 22.4% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 22.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 45.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Lodge
- More residents in Fairfield bay report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.5% in Lodge.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 27.1% compared to 22.4% in Lodge.
- Lodge has a higher smoking rate at 22.4% compared to 20.2% in Fairfield bay.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Lodge at 16.0% compared to 15.7% in Fairfield bay.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield bay at 37.3% compared to 34.9% in Lodge.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lodge at 45.0% compared to 32.0% in Fairfield bay.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield bay | Lodge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (5) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (529) | 60.7% (51) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (151) | 26.2% (22) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.9% (729) | 8.3% (7) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Lodge
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay have no formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.0% in Lodge.
- In Lodge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 60.7% compared to 24.6% in Fairfield bay.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lodge at 26.2%, compared to 7.0% in Fairfield bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 8.3% in Lodge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.