Demographics details for Fairfield bay, AR vs Lancaster, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Fairfield bay, AR vs Lancaster, CA.
| Data | Fairfield bay | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,152 | 169,185 |
| Median Age | 68.2 years | 33.6 years |
| Median Income | $58,750 | $71,367 |
| Married Families | 48.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 8.2 |
Population Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Lancaster
- The population in Lancaster is higher at 169,185, compared to 2,152 in Fairfield bay.
- Residents in Fairfield bay have a higher median age of 68.2 years compared to 33.6 years in Lancaster.
- Lancaster has a higher median income of $71,367, compared to $58,750 in Fairfield bay.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Fairfield bay at 48.0% compared to 32.0% in Lancaster.
- The poverty level is higher in Lancaster at 15%, compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
- Lancaster has a higher unemployment rate at 8.2% compared to 3.5% in Fairfield bay.
Demographics
Demographics Fairfield bay vs Lancaster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Fairfield bay | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 21 |
| White | 86 | 10 |
| Asian | 1 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 7 | 46 |
| Two or More Races | 5 | 18 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
- Fairfield bay has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 10% in Lancaster.
- In Lancaster, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Fairfield bay.
- Lancaster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 7% in Fairfield bay.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Lancaster at 18%, compared to 5% in Fairfield bay.
- In Lancaster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Fairfield bay | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.1% | 17.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.7% | 13.5% |
| Depression | 27.1% | 17.7% |
| Smoking | 20.2% | 14.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 15.7% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 32.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Lancaster
- More residents in Fairfield bay report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.8% in Lancaster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 27.1% compared to 17.7% in Lancaster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Fairfield bay at 20.2% compared to 14.8% in Lancaster.
- Binge drinking is more common in Fairfield bay at 15.7% compared to 15.1% in Lancaster.
- Obesity rates are higher in Fairfield bay at 37.3% compared to 32.9% in Lancaster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Fairfield bay at 32.0% compared to 10.0% in Lancaster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Fairfield bay | Lancaster |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (5) | 2.0% (3,403) |
| High School Diploma | 24.6% (529) | 17.5% (29,555) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (151) | 21.5% (36,421) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 33.9% (729) | 12.3% (20,861) |
Education Levels Comparison: Fairfield bay vs Lancaster
- In Lancaster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.2% in Fairfield bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay hold a high school diploma at 24.6% compared to 17.5% in Lancaster.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lancaster at 21.5%, compared to 7.0% in Fairfield bay.
- A higher percentage of residents in Fairfield bay hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 12.3% in Lancaster.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.